Related Articles
- Japan fights upskirt photography
- Upskirt.
- Choose the best upskirt.
- Lindsay's upskirt
- Alabama or Oklahoma?
- Do you believe same sex marriages should become legal in your country?
- Kirlian photography: the soul of things,choose ur fav pic.
- Auburn or Oklahoma?
- Which team is the best UT or Oklahoma?
- Oklahoma State Representative Sally Kern: Gays worse than terrorists
- What's the most disturbing element in this Michael Jackson pic?
- BEST OLDIE PIC IS???
- Best Tara Conner Pic?
- Best flower pic is?
- Cutest Movie Pic?
ps. being in a public place is no excuse... what next... they can stick a finger or 2 up you because your in a public place? you might be in public but you are in public with clothes on... no-one should have the right to demean or humiliate you merely because you are in public so you are public property... i dont think so... i wonder how many of the sickos who voted actualy have young daughters and would they be as quick to condone it if it were their wifes or daughters who were the victims... makes me sick.
so sick it defies logic... nothing to do with free speach or anything else... just helps perverts and pedophiles. people who do this are one step away from being rapists... what will these sick kiddy photo taking sods do when one of these girls is alone or turns around and catches them when she is alone and no-one to help/protect. these sickos start out takin pics and work their courage up and next thing they "touching" or "groping". if this was your 16 year old daughter you would give the guy a kicking if you caught him... anyone who thinks this sick stuff is fun is a disgrace to the male race... i am male so i should know and i aint gay... but i still think this is an invasion of privacy... windy days blowing up your skirt is a dif thing... on windy days my sisters wear pencil skirts that cant blow up cos they fit to tight... wont stop a perv with a camera though... if i caught someone doing this i would kick them senseless. its a criminal offence to take porn pics of a minor. why is he not charged with attempting to make kiddy porn because those tipe of pics are purely for some saddo to get sexual gratification and this should not be got from a 16 year old. i live in uk, legal age of consent is 16 but i still find this sick.
Fantastic! I love it for real 100%
Thats fantastic! love it
This is legal in all 50 states because the girl is in public place. If she were in a private place like a bathroom then that would be voyeurism if she's photographed without permission.
I swear shorts under all my dresses and skirts anyways. Not for that reason, just incase I fall over or feel like going on a swing or something. haha. Things like this make me glad I take that precaution.
shows democracy prevails
this should be a crime because in new york if you have ur nipple or ur lips showing its a crime. so why is it ok to take a pic of something like that not a crime. her lips are showing.. it wouldent be her fault it should be his. so for the people that dont think it should not be a crime imagine a camra in the bathroom recording u up the towel do u think that would be a crime. its like the same thing its your privetsy and i beileve that that should be a crime. if u wanna see something like that go to ur whife or u girl friend or go look up porn on line for gods sakes. a crotch is a crotch yea they might not all look the same some can be skinny and some can be fat but theres all shapes and sizes on porn. i dont think u should be aloud to take pics of someone that doesent have am intrest in pornography.
it happend to me this moarning at 3:20 if you cant walk in to a store without someone taking a pic of ur butt how do u think it would be walking down the street wen noone is around the people that are taking those nasty pics could be malesters i think its child pernogrophy like i said befor im pissed
realy good point
yea it just happend to me its aloud in rochester new york it was almost the same thing i was in a store a guy got behind me and started to take a pic and i turned around wen he did im like wut r u doin and hes like not u and hes like i was doing something illegal that cant be on camra. and the cops said its not a crime to take a pic im like im 17 hes like 30 it should be consitered as child pernografy.
No one should be able to look up a girl's skirt, especially a 16 yr old's skirt, and not be charged with some kind of crime. This is just another example of the agenda of some to legalize sex with children. DISGUSTING!
i think its discusting my bf yesterday was arrested in Wal mart in NJ for doing that and its not the 1st time hes done it he was caught the last time but nothing happened im making him go for cousiling ... because i told him at the age of 19 yrs old and going on 20 in 3 months thats a sick ness.. i told him he needs to get help... i think its wrong regaurdless if the person is wearing a skirt or not.. i guess the ppl that are for it are saying its perfectly ok.. until it happens to you.. u should be able to wear what ud like but for a guy to take a picture up your skirt.. u all say its because theyre horny, no.. it itsnt its because theyre sick in the head and need help.. it isnt right because hey your husbands/ boyfriends wont like it if u grabbed another man's a** its the same thing.. in a way.. i just think over all it shouldnt be allowed to do.. eventually men like that the way i see it , become phedophiles.. it isnt right the way i see it.. if any one knows if its allowed in the state of new jersey please let me know.. at foxtrottr@yahoo.com
But...The way I look at it, if women are stupid enough to wear short skirts or anything that could reveal EVERYTHING with a strong gust of wind, it's their own fault. People take pictures of people. That's how it is.Me? If I wear a mini skirt out, all day long, I at least have some latex booty shorts on underneath or something. Doesn't take away from the effect, but I won't have to call home and apologize when I show up on the 'net.
thats a great shot, you should wear skirts more.
Were no strangers to loveYou know the rules and so do iA full commitments what Im thinking ofYou wouldnt get this from any other guyI just wanna tell you how Im feelingGotta make you understand* never gonna give you upNever gonna let you downNever gonna run around and desert youNever gonna make you cryNever gonna say goodbyeNever gonna tell a lie and hurt youWeve know each other for so longYour hearts been achingBut youre too shy to say itInside we both know whats been going onWe know the game and were gonna play itAnd if you ask me how Im feelingDont tell me youre too blind to see(* repeat)Give you up. give you upGive you up, give you upNever gonna giveNever gonna give, give you upNever gonna giveNever gonna give, five you upI just wanna tell you how Im feelingGotta make you understand(* repeat 3 times)
I voted "disgusting." Women (and children!) have been wearing skirts for centuries, trusting that there shouldn't be decent men on the floor peering up them. As Marilyn Monroe demonstrated, we don't wear flowing skirts on [windy] days because skirts are not lingerie. So, does this mean peeping Toms are allowed to install "surveillance cameras" on the floor?
I think the guy is invading the girl's personal space. I think about 3 feet apart is OK. Getting close enough to put a camera up her skirt is just too close. People should have some space. Sometimes, people are in crowded places (and 3 feet won't work) like elevators, escalators, trains, Led Zepplin concert ticket lines, etc. Suppose the girl was 15, or 14, or 12, and the mother told the guy to stay away from the daughter, and the guy takes the picture . . . so, now all perverts can legally prey on our children? That just isn't right. People should be able to go out in public without being molested. The world is turning upside-down.
likeness from unauthorized use? The law is if you are in public your photo may be taken, your house may be photographed, anything in public domaain can be recorded or taken a picture of. Only exceptions are anything in the private dowmain such as if it is the rule of a private establichment, but in that case u may only be asked to leave. Your camera or film may not be confisgated unless there is a warrant or you are arreted by a law enforcement official. So yes it may be rude and offensve but that doesnt make it a crime unless he touched her. Just be careful and watch your back like in anything you do. Also he is not allowed to legally sell the photo unless she gives written permission, but may post it. Deframation of character or invading private space thank god are not laws, only attempted civil suits.
No, if the wind blew the skirt up it would be a gift from God. However, kneeling and using a camera unbeknowist to the object of attention is rude, crude, and a violation of personal dignity. Taking the picture while sitting at a publicly provided table or bench next to a clear sided escalator is just bad (or good) thinking on the establishments part.
someone took a pic up my skirt I'd kick them in the face. probably more than once. They could then go home and enjoy the photo through their watery eyes and broken nose. It may not be a crime but it's a violation of their personal space to get up close to their cooter. Some things may be legal but still really really wrong.
Actually, Marilyn Monroe's famous skirt photo was NOT from a windy day, but rather she was standing over a subway grate which commonly has gusts of air coming up from underground.
There should be a distinction made between passive and active behavior.PASSIVE: sitting on a bench in the mall, watching women in skirts ride up the clear-sided escalator.ACTIVE: Crawling on all fours like a dog, or using a camera with the night-vision-in-daylight circuit modification to see through clothing, or using a James Bond spy cam in your shoe.
Oh yeah, blame the victim. Fucking dipshit.
Perhaps he should invest in a computer and the internet and ogle pictures there. He can google porn, and he might even be "feeling lucky"...
This just defines criminality. It shouldn't be a criminal offense, but that girl has every right to sue him in civil court (and she'll probably win, too).
She was in a store, while it was private property, you have NO expectation of privacy because you are IN PUBLIC. If she is OUT IN PUBLIC, it cannot be invasion of privacy, because you cannot reasonably have an expectation of privacy! While I personally find the upskirt thing reprehensible, did I just hear a threat to break a camera/nose? I will NOT hesitate to defend myself or my property in the face of your assault. Whether you be male or female, I will respond with equivalent force to protect my property and self.
and if the wind had blown it up? Would you then be "invading her privacy"?
It's not child porn. There is no overt sexuallity. You have no expectation of privacy in a public place, under the law.
If I was her I would beat the ever living shit out of him and then break the camera/phone and his nose. This is an invasion of privacy. This has NOTHING to do with freedom of speech.What are you expressing exactly? That the only way you can even LOOK at ass is by sneaking a camera under a young girls skirt? Pathetic. However, I agree on the point people shouldn't wear such revelaing clothing if they do not want attention. But that is crossing the line. If she is underaged then that dipshit who took a picture is def. a potention pedophile.
yea seriously ...16 years old...thats child porn/shit you get put away for a long time for doing
Sure, if you're peeping up her skirt.
She was far from "covered up".
Privacy invasion - would lead to the extinction of skirts - a disaster for the summer environment
apparently, jealousy discourages beauty. because her face isn't shown she's protected. However it's behavior like this from men in our society that make women feel the need to be covered up. How stupid.
This is nonsense, not the poll ofcourse, but someone pretending to be Wim Heitinga. For the last time I AM WIM HEITINGA!
If some guy can't take upskirt pictures.. THEN WHATS NEXT? YOUR ABILITY TO DRIVE CARS?!
If you are going to dress in a skirt that is so short someone can walk behind you and take a picture under it. its your problem. Its getting stupid. you can walk down the street and see upskirts everywhere, not even intentionally looking.
im not not really in favor of this... tsk! be'coz the dignity of females will be low and cheap... especially here in manila, our culture is conservative... that's a very bad impression already and it's like a prostitution which is strictly prohibited here...
Burkas for everyone!! >.<
What if the girl turned around caught him in the act and then beat the shit out of him would she be arrested for assault or would that action be self defense as she was protecting her likeness from unauthorized use.
Only possible if one dresses like a whore. You reap what you sow. If you're worried, wear pants. Problem solved!
I agree with the last guest. Photography in public is and should stay legal, that being said I do believe this guy could and should have been brought up on charges of having lurid pictures of an under age girl.
I find the poll to be highly misleading. Whether or not it supports horny guys is completely irrelevent. If it can be seen in public, it can be photographed. Period. End of story. Full stop. If you don't like it, don't wear revealing clothing. Now, that being said, does that excuse this photographer from his perverse behaviour? No. Could he have been brought to court under different charges, ones that would have stuck? Most likely. So thank the prosecuter for being boneheaded and not doing his research into what's going to get the guy behind bars.
Sorry. My Name was Wim Heitinga. My bad.
Very bad decision. Greetz, Wim Hetingarelatiecode erfv3%%55
that just makes me sick
I think the court is wrong. But I also think, in this specific example, if you don't want people taking pictures of your ass, wear a skirt a little less revealing. Picking up a quarter or a strong gust of wind would probably reveal just as much as the picture.
Candid. The article says "an unsuspecting 16-year-old girl."
it all depends on whether the photos were candid, or the skirts posed for the camera. if they were candid, then that's just bad behavior, if not, than it's like soft core porn