Feb 15th, 2008 | Amy Winehouse survey

Amy Winehouse was forced to cover up her topless girl tattoo for her Grammy performance. What's more offensive to you?



Amy Winehouse was forced to cover up her topless girl tattoo for her Grammy performance. Whats more offensive to you?


165 votes, 595 views , 5 comments
 
 
Poll tags:Amy Winehouse, Puritans, Tattoo, America, Boobs, Grammy, Body Parts, Tits

 
Add your comment
Update your status line


Comments (5)
Eribubbly
(Reply)
California, United States

posted Jan 15th, 2009 at 00:51 CST

So stupid, they're not even real boobs, they a fuckin picture, why are people suck pricks nowadays??

Drowlord
(Reply)
Texas, United States

posted Sep 8th, 2008 at 17:21 CDT

Neither, honestly.

(Reply)
posted Feb 21st, 2008 at 16:45 CST

yet another case of censorship.... the many catering to the whims of the useless few!!!!!

Sylvie_b
(Reply)
South Africa

posted Feb 16th, 2008 at 15:42 CST

tattoos are so common and ugly. Makes her look like a builder or something. Not that I have anything against builders....just don't think girls should look like them!

(Reply)
posted Feb 15th, 2008 at 15:47 CST

Who cares, I want to see her tits!

 
Log in using your:

* Username
* Email address
* Password
 
Buddy icon
* Gender
     
* Birth date
Country
City
 (your vote will still count)
Embed Flash Widget
Embed Java Script Widget
Copy & paste the embed code to your site.