I did read the whole thing, but I clearly missed the "myth part"...my mistake. I'm not sure how, but oh well. At any rate, Obama's agenda is the Democrats agenda. The president doesn't have nearly as much control as people think.
Uh yeah, that's one person out of how many? How does one person represent all Liberals/Democrats? Do your math and then try again. Also, make it shorter. Oh, and he lost part of his finger when he cut it in high school. It was due to an infection. Geez...He's not a badass....he's an arrogant hot head that is big on theatrics.
Liberal agenda? LOL! A description of Rahm Emanuel, who Obama wants as his Chief of Staff:-Friends and enemies agree that the key to Emanuel’s success is his legendary intensity. There’s the story about the time he sent a rotting fish to a pollster who had angered him. There’s the story about how his right middle finger was blown off by a Syrian tank when he was in the Israeli army.And there’s the story of how, the night after Clinton was elected, Emanuel was so angry at the president’s enemies that he stood up at a celebratory dinner with colleagues from the campaign, grabbed a steak knife and began rattling off a list of betrayers, shouting "Dead! . . . Dead! . . . Dead!" and plunging the knife into the table after every name. "When he was done, the table looked like a lunar landscape," one campaign veteran recalls. "It was like something out of The Godfather. But that’s Rahm for you."Of the three stories, only the second is a myth — Emanuel lost the finger to a meat slicer as a teenager and never served in the Israeli army. But it’s a measure of his considerable reputation as the enforcer in Clinton’s White House that so many people believe it to be true. You don’t earn the nickname "Rahmbo" being timid.-Think again
I'll venture to say that today's presidency is very different than the presidency was 75 years ago. I don't think Obama and Roosevelt can even be compared to one another.
I did read the whole thing, but I clearly missed the "myth part"...my mistake. I'm not sure how, but oh well. At any rate, Obama's agenda is the Democrats agenda. The president doesn't have nearly as much control as people think.
Liberal me up, Liberal me down...
How does one person best define Obama's agenda? By making him CHIEF of staff!! And READ the whole intro next time if you're going to comment on it.
why not?
Agreed again....
Agreed....
and a clinton retread that does not signal change...
they can't be compared...not at all
Uh yeah, that's one person out of how many? How does one person represent all Liberals/Democrats? Do your math and then try again. Also, make it shorter. Oh, and he lost part of his finger when he cut it in high school. It was due to an infection. Geez...He's not a badass....he's an arrogant hot head that is big on theatrics.
Liberal agenda? LOL! A description of Rahm Emanuel, who Obama wants as his Chief of Staff:-Friends and enemies agree that the key to Emanuel’s success is his legendary intensity. There’s the story about the time he sent a rotting fish to a pollster who had angered him. There’s the story about how his right middle finger was blown off by a Syrian tank when he was in the Israeli army.And there’s the story of how, the night after Clinton was elected, Emanuel was so angry at the president’s enemies that he stood up at a celebratory dinner with colleagues from the campaign, grabbed a steak knife and began rattling off a list of betrayers, shouting "Dead! . . . Dead! . . . Dead!" and plunging the knife into the table after every name. "When he was done, the table looked like a lunar landscape," one campaign veteran recalls. "It was like something out of The Godfather. But that’s Rahm for you."Of the three stories, only the second is a myth — Emanuel lost the finger to a meat slicer as a teenager and never served in the Israeli army. But it’s a measure of his considerable reputation as the enforcer in Clinton’s White House that so many people believe it to be true. You don’t earn the nickname "Rahmbo" being timid.-Think again
I'll venture to say that today's presidency is very different than the presidency was 75 years ago. I don't think Obama and Roosevelt can even be compared to one another.
Roosevelt was far further to the left than Obama ever was. He was not soft on national security.