WELL MORON PEOPLE CAN CONSENT TO IT AND THEY ARE SO FUCKING GREEDY THAT THEY'D DO IT FOR MONEY AND BESIDES WHY SHOULD IT BE DONE ON ANIMALS? THEY ARE MUCH MORE IMPORTANT THAN HUMAN SCUM WHO DESTROY THE PLANET, ANIMALS CANT SAY NO AND THEY DONT HURT ANYONE WHEREAS MURDERERS HAVE YOU THICK SHIT
It can be if it is going to be more harmful for the animals than the benefit that comes from it, be it towards man kind or animals themselves. Actually if any harm at all is done to the animals it is kind of mean. I think. I'm not positive. I'll have to think about this one some more.
WELL MORON PEOPLE CAN CONSENT TO IT AND THEY ARE SO FUCKING GREEDY THAT THEY'D DO IT FOR MONEY AND BESIDES WHY SHOULD IT BE DONE ON ANIMALS? THEY ARE MUCH MORE IMPORTANT THAN HUMAN SCUM WHO DESTROY THE PLANET, ANIMALS CANT SAY NO AND THEY DONT HURT ANYONE WHEREAS MURDERERS HAVE YOU THICK SHIT
You sir have a cold heart for saying to test it on anyone.
TEST IT ON HUMAN SCUM NOT INNOCENT ANIMALS. THEY COULD ALWAYS GO TO THE LOCAL JAIL AND GIVE IT A GO ON THE MURDERERS
I think in general it is wrong, but I agree with Bmccue7.
Sometimes yes. Sometimes no. It depends on a group of variables I guess. I am pretty much in agreement with what Scooter wrote.
It can be if it is going to be more harmful for the animals than the benefit that comes from it, be it towards man kind or animals themselves. Actually if any harm at all is done to the animals it is kind of mean. I think. I'm not positive. I'll have to think about this one some more.
Depends on the testing, and depends on the animal. Is a fruit fly an animal?