He most definitely had weapons of mass destruction and he used them against his own people. He also so had plenty of time to move them to Syria because we are so damn P.C. that we gave advance notice of our arrival. Saddam was no better than that EVIL idiot in Iran who is just licking his chops to get his first nuke so he can again launch another UN-provoked attack on Israel
iraq had chemical weapons....they also had fighter jets buried in the sand....many believe that all weapons were shipped to syria before we entered iraq...after all it was announced we were on the way....which gave saddam plenty of time to move them out...
I don't really think that they had any nukes. Israel blew up their nucelar reactor I believe in 1983 and that was never built up again.What they were accused of having was Weapons of Mass Destruction, which I do not think necessarily means nukes, but i'm not sure.To me, possessing mean of gassing thousands and thousands of Kurds is a weapon of mass destruction.
Does the word "yellowcake" ring a bell?
He most definitely had weapons of mass destruction and he used them against his own people. He also so had plenty of time to move them to Syria because we are so damn P.C. that we gave advance notice of our arrival. Saddam was no better than that EVIL idiot in Iran who is just licking his chops to get his first nuke so he can again launch another UN-provoked attack on Israel
Yeah, it's a PR disaster for us that there were no WMD. But we had other legitimate reasons to go in.
Even if Saddam didn't have nukes, he was guilty of genocide and not adhering to his agreement with America.
iraq had chemical weapons....they also had fighter jets buried in the sand....many believe that all weapons were shipped to syria before we entered iraq...after all it was announced we were on the way....which gave saddam plenty of time to move them out...
I don't really think that they had any nukes. Israel blew up their nucelar reactor I believe in 1983 and that was never built up again.What they were accused of having was Weapons of Mass Destruction, which I do not think necessarily means nukes, but i'm not sure.To me, possessing mean of gassing thousands and thousands of Kurds is a weapon of mass destruction.
Did anyone ever say that Iraq had nuclear weapons? I thought that they were accused of having chemical weapons.