It's "ok" as is (if you like plain vanilla), but it may be better with a C between the O & P: "OCP"Seem to be "Obsessive Compulsive Pollsters" -- label them accurately. =)
I don't think there should be a list at all. It creates an emphasis on quantity over quality. Besides, competitive pollsters can always check their own number of polls against another individual pollster if they must.-Off topic: perhaps when a user registers a new name, that name should be more than one letter different from existing names. That might prevent the possibility of a new user choosing a name and identity that intentionally mocks an existing user. An example of this appears on this very page.
I see what you mean!
It's "ok" as is (if you like plain vanilla), but it may be better with a C between the O & P: "OCP"Seem to be "Obsessive Compulsive Pollsters" -- label them accurately. =)
I don't think there should be a list at all. It creates an emphasis on quantity over quality. Besides, competitive pollsters can always check their own number of polls against another individual pollster if they must.-Off topic: perhaps when a user registers a new name, that name should be more than one letter different from existing names. That might prevent the possibility of a new user choosing a name and identity that intentionally mocks an existing user. An example of this appears on this very page.
i like chronic
A few Ideas:FrequentPersistentR ecurrent ChronicTop
top pollsters