Related Topics & Searches
Related Articles
- Is religion a threat to rationality and science?
- Is it better to give then to receive? Where do you fit in with this philosophy?
- Is being Jewish an ethnicity or religion?
- Why was Religion created?
- Laughing Lord Buddha
- Is Druidry, as practiced today, a religion?
- The greatest science in the world; in heaven and on earth; is love. ~ Mother Teresa
- What religion do you have most (of the given)
- Do you like science fiction?
- Do you believe that "Buddha Boy" is really a reincarnation of the Buddha?
- Religion today is not as "peaceful" as it should be?
- Movie sentence that best defines your philosophy of life? (Part 1)
- When nature calls it calls would a pregnant jenifer garner pull down her underwear an hang her but over a cliff in the wilderness an take a poop
- WHAT IS YOUR RELIGION? (IF ANY,PLEASE SPECIFY)
- Christianity could "die out within a century"
OK, I think this discussion is an indirect way of abusing religions and starting religious arguments.First of all, They can't be in a room together!! They were all from different eras.....OK? And if they were(if ever possible which is not)Mohammad PBUH would speak first bcoz He is Allah's last messanger and I dont believe in Buddha and Confucious......They were common men!
OK, I think this discussion is an indirect way of abusing religions and starting religious arguments.First of all, They can't be in a room together!! They were all from different eras.....OK? And if they were(if ever possible which is not)Mohammad PBUH would speak first bcoz He is Allah's last messanger and I dont believe in Buddha and Confucious......They were common men!
Moses would speak first and he would say "sorry guys. I'm not sure what I'm doing here with you guys so I'll just make my way out the door now." (then he'd step out).
THIS SUCKS, ISLAM DOESNT SAY THAT MUHAMMAD [P.B.U.H] WAS BETTER THAN JESUS [P.B.U.H] OR MOSES [P.B.U.H] WAS BETTER THAN MUHAMMAD [P.B.U.H], OR WISE-VERSA, ALLAH SURE LOVES HIS PROPHETS MOST EQUALLY, ITS JUST LIKE ASKING A PARENT WHETHER WHICH CHILD HE LOVES THE MOST, WHEN ALL ARE MOST OBEDIENT..!!
Muhammad is the seal of the prophets and is send to whole the world unlike Jesus and Moses who they are sent only to their poeple
Muhammad is the seal of the prophets and is send to whole the world unlike Jesus and Moses who they are sent only to their poeple
Confucius was known to give constant advice and criticism. The man never shut up.
too bad for you
Jesus would talk first, and he would ask: "Does anyone got any bud?".
Confucius: "So a priest and a rabbi walk into a bar and..."/ Buddha: :)/ The rest: :0
with what i've seen of buddha, he would say "we" are hungry
i think the comment about the most aggressive being the first to speak is probably right...hummm...let's see, who made aggression,violence and forced "conversion" a tenet of his religion? who made killing others (or yourself) a shortcut to heaven?
The question is one of omnisicience. If any of these people are omniscient, then that person would know who be first to speak.
Usually, the more agressive the person, the quicker he is to speak. Thus, we must decide who is the most agressive.
moses would because he was a bossy know it all
rotflmao
Romans lied....
Jesus! I'm a confuciused about allah this. I have to think about it and get back to you. In the meantime I'm abuddah have mohammad swiss sandwich buddha with mustard instead of mayo.
Moo-Hommid would declare jihad and kill everybody else for being infidels.
"Dude, did you see the new Indiana Jones? Aliens! Yeah man, aliens! I know! And that kid from Even Stevens..."
Buddha to Muhammad, Jesus, and Moses: Are you going to eat that? *points to the roast pig on the table*
Wrong. Google Roman historian Tacitus. There is historical proof outside of the scriptures.
they would all look at each other and in unison say "He does exist!"
Wrong. There is no proof other than anecdotal heresay anywhere outside of scripture attesting to the existence of either Moses or Jesus. If the existence of either went before the courts today, the case for their existence would be thrown out of court... As for the rest of the dudes here, their existence and histories are well documented by third parties.
yeah, right!
how do you know I'm a sir?
Haven't each of these people been proven to exist in one way or another? Buddha isn't even an individual person either.
Pretty sure he meant the ark of the covenant, not Noah's ark. Here's where you slap yourself on the forehead and say 'doh!'
Confucius seems like he always has a lot to say.
You are rude sir!
Moses would NOT be first as he had a speech issue, Aaron, spoke for him during the plagues.
Moses - Wazzzzaaaap!!!!!
incorrect.Jesus was real, "buddha" was Siddhartha. confucius was was real as was mohammad.Moses is real, too.if only americans had as many brains as cheeseburgers.
WOW! The only person here who does not have his arrogant head up his ass!!! I doubt very seriously that your a white american ... because you actually think for yourself! Very rare ins the U.S... very rare indeed. I hope you find enlightenment !
Jesus. "Boys, Canada is a lost cause. Not a single believerl. Time to loose a plague."
easter bunny, definately. they've got the feet for it
Actually, Jesus was a real man and did walk the face of this earth, so sorry man.
It was Noah who built the ark not Moses!!
tripleX: Actually I like to say something...
Nobody would speak 'cos they're all fictitious
Mohammad would immediately kill everyone else in the room, then proclaim "god is great".
No such thing as god, but there is a God.
There was an actual buddha. He experienced life in many ways from poverty to riches, hunger to feasting. and in the end he came to the same conclusions as Solomon. It's ll dust in the wind, it doesn't matter how you choose to live. This life is temporary without God.
Confucius he say... so it must have been him
But then he is, since GOD isn't 'the earth' [pffft!] but the universe, and since Yeushua bin Yosiphas was created by [and of] the universe then hes GOD. athiests: flatearthers without sense of humour.
moses is older , and you know how oldies are , they must say something just cover the farts
Moses is most like a mortal so he would speak first.
Moses had a slight speech impediment and hated orating. That's why the Bible discribes his reluctants to take the role. After God told him to do so he allowed Moses' brother to assist him in the public speaking area.
Moses. "Dudes, lets do some shots, then I will tell you about the whole ark thing which you ain't gonna believe."
If it's the first time they're together in a room they probably burst out in laughter together, and it will be very hard to speak at all.
Confucious, of course. He'd say, "All of you died before I was born."
probably gintonix. and they'd speak german (cause god speaks german whenever he means business (q. Zappa)) mK
"to yo momma" that is =] mK
But then he isnt. No such thing as god, unless you'd want to call the earth god... mK (note the use of lower case for god)
I think the time frame is all important in this thesis, I mean; do they all know who the others are? And, more importantly; what they grew out to be in our (your) religions nowadays? If so, I predict a LONG and very awkward, if not embarased silence, after which any of the above would suggest drinks. My 2cts, mK
so the revisionist Muhammed would be a man of peace and not a caravan-jacking, bloody-handed thug who imposed islam by the sword?
Perhaps the next question should be : Of the Easter Bunny, the Tooth Fairy, Santa Claus and an honest politician which would be the best tap dancer? Since all of the participants in both questions are either imaginary or so blown out of their original reality that they are no longer recognizable any answer is correct or a least defendable.
What no Lao Tzu?
Jesus, knowing scripture, would begin by saying "word."
No way on Moses. He never spoke. His brother always spoke for him b.c he stuttered.
There is a branch of Buddhism that denies as irrelevant the existence of an individual historical Buddha.
couldn't be moses, he stuttered.
Buddha would to ask why there was a need to be first
Didn't Buddha claim to be born 1000 times or something? That's a claim of DOING something in my book.
To know who would speak last, see Numbers 12:3.
If Jesus is God then he knows who would speak first... so let's ask him
Wait long enough - there won't be actual historical evidence that any of us existed. So much for logical points.
Nah, there is little actual historical evidence that any of them actually existed, INCLUDING Buddha. The only exception is Mohammad, and he was a stark raving lunatic. So much for gods and prophets.
Jesus will probably start by saying: "First!!!!1"^___^
Buddha isn't a god. He was a real person. Buddha never claimed to do anything. Just enlightened. Confucious was a real person and not a religious entity. Mohammad, also real. Jesus..not so much. Moses, more evidence that he existed but not so much doing anything but climbing a hill having schizophrenic delusions and hearing voices. I took stuff that did that in the 80's
Moses would break the ice by talking about the weather.
Mohammed would say, "Die you dogs of infidels!"
Confucius - He would say "Man who farted in church sit in own pew".
Aren't most of them "fictional" characters?
Moses: "So, uhh.....Jesus....Can I get a piece of you NOW, or do we have to wait for later for snacks? I mean, parting that Red Sea made me kinda thirsty...and I hear your blood tastes like communal wine..."
Well, Jesus is fictional and Confucius and Buddha would probably think before talking. That leaves Moses and Mohammed. I get the impression that Mohammed is more aggressive and/or assertive.
cofucius,saying.I´m so smart that I don´t even need a head anymore
Can't imagine Budha or Confucius speaking first - they're all about patience and zen. So it'll have to be one of the three monotheistic guys. Considering Jesus is the most popular, I imagine him speaking first.