i think the comment about the most aggressive being the first to speak is probably right...hummm...let's see, who made aggression,violence and forced "conversion" a tenet of his religion? who made killing others (or yourself) a shortcut to heaven?
www.detroitboobtube.comwe ll it wouldnt be mohammad he would have a dick in his mouth. whole society based on jelousy errogance and blowing little boys. they hate women. women are for making more men
Jesus! I'm a confuciused about allah this. I have to think about it and get back to you. In the meantime I'm abuddah have mohammad swiss sandwich buddha with mustard instead of mayo.
Wrong. There is no proof other than anecdotal heresay anywhere outside of scripture attesting to the existence of either Moses or Jesus. If the existence of either went before the courts today, the case for their existence would be thrown out of court... As for the rest of the dudes here, their existence and histories are well documented by third parties.
Confucius was known to give constant advice and criticism. The man never shut up.
too bad for you
Jesus would talk first, and he would ask: "Does anyone got any bud?".
Confucius: "So a priest and a rabbi walk into a bar and..."/ Buddha: :)/ The rest: :0
with what i've seen of buddha, he would say "we" are hungry
i think the comment about the most aggressive being the first to speak is probably right...hummm...let's see, who made aggression,violence and forced "conversion" a tenet of his religion? who made killing others (or yourself) a shortcut to heaven?
The question is one of omnisicience. If any of these people are omniscient, then that person would know who be first to speak.
Usually, the more agressive the person, the quicker he is to speak. Thus, we must decide who is the most agressive.
www.detroitboobtube.comwe ll it wouldnt be mohammad he would have a dick in his mouth. whole society based on jelousy errogance and blowing little boys. they hate women. women are for making more men
moses would because he was a bossy know it all
rotflmao
Romans lied....
Jesus! I'm a confuciused about allah this. I have to think about it and get back to you. In the meantime I'm abuddah have mohammad swiss sandwich buddha with mustard instead of mayo.
Moo-Hommid would declare jihad and kill everybody else for being infidels.
"Dude, did you see the new Indiana Jones? Aliens! Yeah man, aliens! I know! And that kid from Even Stevens..."
Buddha to Muhammad, Jesus, and Moses: Are you going to eat that? *points to the roast pig on the table*
Wrong. Google Roman historian Tacitus. There is historical proof outside of the scriptures.
they would all look at each other and in unison say "He does exist!"
Wrong. There is no proof other than anecdotal heresay anywhere outside of scripture attesting to the existence of either Moses or Jesus. If the existence of either went before the courts today, the case for their existence would be thrown out of court... As for the rest of the dudes here, their existence and histories are well documented by third parties.
yeah, right!