I support Viacom's lawsuit, but not for the reason described in the survey. Quite bluntly, the proliferation of copyrighted material on YouTube makes YouTube a LESS EFFECTIVE communications tool. I.e. the bandwidth, search tools, and content rating tools that are meant to enahance user-generated communication, are instead being wasted on sharing and promoting copyrighted content that the creators don't want to be shared. That's pretty much a lose-lose situation for everyone. YouTube's tagline is "broadcast yourself," not "re-broadcast someone else without their permission."
I think Viacom needs to worry about themselves instead of everyone else. One billion is BS IMO. Seems like Napster all over again.
I support Viacom's lawsuit, but not for the reason described in the survey. Quite bluntly, the proliferation of copyrighted material on YouTube makes YouTube a LESS EFFECTIVE communications tool. I.e. the bandwidth, search tools, and content rating tools that are meant to enahance user-generated communication, are instead being wasted on sharing and promoting copyrighted content that the creators don't want to be shared. That's pretty much a lose-lose situation for everyone. YouTube's tagline is "broadcast yourself," not "re-broadcast someone else without their permission."